When we speak of environmental issues the debate sometimes turns toward a lofty left approach which sometimes can become absurd. However, most of the factors surrounding the discussion revolves around our executive, legislative, and judicial branches, along with the largest regulatory agency, the Environmental Protection Agency. Each of these components really has its own part to play in the dance they do with each other and the general public.
Presidential agendas and campaigns seeking to balloon or shrink the magnitude and effort of environmental protection has occurred throughout the past four decades. However, it also is somewhat of a constant battle fundamentally and philosophically with how each administration deals with these issues. Also, their work with their counterpart branch just blocks away becomes either a roadblock or pathway to improve or eliminate environmental regulations and standards.
Furthermore, there is a somewhat quiet presence of the U.S. Supreme Court and its interpretation of policy in both federal and state legislation. With the courts seeking to determine the right behind legal action, interpretation of law, and how to solve or remedy the problems being brought to suit. I really like seeing the use of Supplemental Environmental Projects (SEPs), as they are sort of a way to insert and ingrain those at fault to a societal gain.
Monday, February 1, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment